Apple, in contrast, competes best with Microsoft on the desktop and accommodates Wintel servers as part of the cost of doing that. Thus Linux scores its greatest successes against Microsoft by competing for data center dollars and accommodates Wintel clients as part of the cost of doing that.
#COMPARE LINUX VS MAC OS X SOFTWARE#
That difference comes down to this: the Linux focus is on replacing other technologies, and particularly those from Microsoft, where Apple's focus is on using its server software to make it easier for MacOS X desktop users to co-exist in Wintel dominated environments. Instead, at least in most cases, what's likely to drive the decision is a a basic difference in philosophy between the Mac and Linux camps. In other words, Apple's ease of use advantage over Linux depends ultimately on an impersonal sales and deployment model: if joe average small business guy gets his Intel server delivered by FedEx and then has to set it up himself, Apple's software can really help - but if Jane's Computers hands it over it all nicely set-up and running, then it will take long term customer behavioral change before the customer sees any benefit from Apple's systems management software.įor larger businesses, neither licensing costs nor set-up costs are likely to drive the decision. Fundamentally that comes down to the issue of how the small business gets its servers to work: because the difference between clicking through a GUIfied process and calling a script is enormously valuable if you don't know what scripts to call, and pretty much valueless if you do. When you compare MacOS X server to Linux, however, the key advantage for small businesses isn't capital cost, it's ease of setup and use. Thus Apple's decision to include free ecommunications software with the server coupled with its inability to charge client licensing makes MacOS X increasingly attractive as the number of clients grows.
![compare linux vs mac os x compare linux vs mac os x](http://www.extremetech.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/os-x-yosemite-vs-windows-10.jpg)
When you compare MacOS X to Microsoft's servers the big issues are reliability, ease of installation, licensing cost, and operational complexity - with licensing cost the most important for small businesses because these tend to focus on initial capital costs.
#COMPARE LINUX VS MAC OS X PROFESSIONAL#
It appears that the big changes in the server version focus on ease of use, particularly with respect to network setup, and on getting along in a predominantly Windows environment.Īs a result the new MacOS X Server is much more competitive with Linux than "Tiger" was - and especially so for very small businesses with little or no professional IT support and the courage to look beyond Microsoft.
![compare linux vs mac os x compare linux vs mac os x](https://www.securitronlinux.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/macosx.png)
Comments specific to Leopard Server here are, therefore, based on third party reports. Please note that I have not had a chance to see and use the new MacOS X "Leopard" server release. 41 impressive questions to ask in a job interview